<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRA Minimum Distribution for 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ira.com/ira-minimum-distribution-2011/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ira.com/ira-minimum-distribution-2011?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ira-minimum-distribution-2011</link>
	<description>#1 Source For IRA guidance, help, and information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:46:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.ira.com/ira-minimum-distribution-2011#comment-26870</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ira.bluelayermedia.com/?p=1230#comment-26870</guid>
		<description>If any one is stupid it is the two idiots that left previous comments.

If they bothered to check the sources they will find out that table came from the IRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any one is stupid it is the two idiots that left previous comments.</p>
<p>If they bothered to check the sources they will find out that table came from the IRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W L</title>
		<link>http://www.ira.com/ira-minimum-distribution-2011#comment-26578</link>
		<dc:creator>W L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ira.bluelayermedia.com/?p=1230#comment-26578</guid>
		<description>N
Puhleeze, you are the stupid one.  The table means that if you live to 71 there is an expectancy that you can live to be 97.  If you live to 56 that expectancy goes down to maybe 78.  You don&#039;t get it about life expectancy tables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N<br />
Puhleeze, you are the stupid one.  The table means that if you live to 71 there is an expectancy that you can live to be 97.  If you live to 56 that expectancy goes down to maybe 78.  You don&#8217;t get it about life expectancy tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.ira.com/ira-minimum-distribution-2011#comment-25346</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ira.bluelayermedia.com/?p=1230#comment-25346</guid>
		<description>Chris,

This life expectancy table can&#039;t be right.

A person who is 70 can&#039;t have a life expectancy of 27 years.  Expected to live to 97.

puhleeze.

I believe it&#039;s 17 years, expected to live to 87.

Check your facts,

N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>This life expectancy table can&#8217;t be right.</p>
<p>A person who is 70 can&#8217;t have a life expectancy of 27 years.  Expected to live to 97.</p>
<p>puhleeze.</p>
<p>I believe it&#8217;s 17 years, expected to live to 87.</p>
<p>Check your facts,</p>
<p>N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.ira.com @ 2013-05-21 19:29:49 -->